I thought it would be a Squirrell as the recent post was on them, very nice close up:D
SittingFox
24 Oct 2007
Wow, great shot! :up:
Words
24 Oct 2007
100% crop. I was surprised it was so sharp. Pleased, but surprised!
Mickeyjoe-Irl
29 Oct 2007
:eyes: That is one heck of a close up.
Words
29 Oct 2007
That's pretty much on the limit of the lens unless I get an extender of some sort.
chthoniid
29 Oct 2007
I've been wondering about how to improve the close ups too, but am going to try out the Raynox macro-lens adaptors. These are supposed to be much better than standard diopters, and are easier to add/remove than an extension tube.
Wow, that is a fantastic photo of the mouse. :eyes: :up:
Words
29 Oct 2007
Brendan
I'm going to have to investigate further on what to get next, but I suspect some variant on a ring flash will be necessary if I get in much closer. Saw some good write-ups of the Raynox by googling.
Words
29 Oct 2007
Thanks Elke!
chthoniid
30 Oct 2007
Hi
yes, I normally avoid anything that looks like a diopter, but quite a few people are starting to take notice of the Raynox stuff. I'm persuaded to give them a try. Otherwise I'd be heading down the extension tube route also. The Raynox looks a bit more compact than extension tubes and easier to change in the field.
A ring flash can be quite handy- I've seen photos at least with them. So far though, I think my camera budget for the year has been exhausted. To some extent, the wireless flash with the alpha does mean I can escape the restriction of a flash on the camera itself.
This website uses cookies to aid the operation of the site. AcceptRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Dudley
23 Oct 2007Wood Mouse.
Words
23 Oct 2007Nope! Though you're on the right track.
chthoniid
23 Oct 2007hedgehog?
The eyes suggest a nocturnal beastie.
Words
23 Oct 2007Obviously too easy ;). Spot on Andy!
Sounds good. Yes let's set something up.
Flying Red Fox Blog
24 Oct 2007I thought it would be a Squirrell as the recent post was on them, very nice close up:D
SittingFox
24 Oct 2007Wow, great shot! :up:
Words
24 Oct 2007100% crop. I was surprised it was so sharp. Pleased, but surprised!
Mickeyjoe-Irl
29 Oct 2007:eyes: That is one heck of a close up.
Words
29 Oct 2007That's pretty much on the limit of the lens unless I get an extender of some sort.
chthoniid
29 Oct 2007I've been wondering about how to improve the close ups too, but am going to try out the Raynox macro-lens adaptors. These are supposed to be much better than standard diopters, and are easier to add/remove than an extension tube.
E.g. the Raynox DCR-250 has following flickr group dedicated to it-
http://www.flickr.com/groups/raynoxdcr250/
ALLY_G
29 Oct 2007Wow, that is a fantastic photo of the mouse. :eyes: :up:
Words
29 Oct 2007Brendan
I'm going to have to investigate further on what to get next, but I suspect some variant on a ring flash will be necessary if I get in much closer. Saw some good write-ups of the Raynox by googling.
Words
29 Oct 2007Thanks Elke!
chthoniid
30 Oct 2007Hi
yes, I normally avoid anything that looks like a diopter, but quite a few people are starting to take notice of the Raynox stuff. I'm persuaded to give them a try. Otherwise I'd be heading down the extension tube route also. The Raynox looks a bit more compact than extension tubes and easier to change in the field.
A ring flash can be quite handy- I've seen photos at least with them. So far though, I think my camera budget for the year has been exhausted. To some extent, the wireless flash with the alpha does mean I can escape the restriction of a flash on the camera itself.
Chthonic regards- B
Words
9 Jan 2008:eyes:
BitzyMe
9 Jan 2008(huge font) W O W ….! Holy Mega nocternal pupil!